Jornada Experimental Range: Albedo from AVHRR BRDFs

It has been suggested that many LiSK BRDF model inversions fail when inverted against "noisy" AVHRR data, with unreliable and negative retrieved model parameters leading to estimates of albedo which are out of range (i.e. not in the range 0..1). While the preprocessing (calibration, registration, atmospheric correction and contamination-screening) of AVHRR data are not trivial, this is not borne out by experiments with multiscene AVHRR over New Mexico (Chopping, Large-scale BRDF retrieval over New Mexico with a multiangular NOAA AVHRR dataset, Remote Sensing of Environment 74(1):163-191). When an iso-LiSparseMODIS-RossThin model is used, the vast majority of retrieved parameters are positive in both visible and near-infared channels and the corresponding white sky and black sky albedos are also reasonable:

Visible (VIS) and Near-Infrared (NIR) White Sky Albedos from AVHRR BRDFs and AMBRALS v3.0

(U. of Colorado PROVE data set, reprocessed by MJC as per Remote Sensing of Environment 74(1):163-191; AMBRALS iso-LiSparseMODIS-RossThin model (reciprocal kernels), displayed via a 2-SD stretch, with histograms):

Visible and Near-Infrared White Sky
Albedos from AVHRR BRDFs and AMBRALS v3.0


 


Some results with AMBRALS v2.4


Use Back button | Mark's BRDF page | Disclaimer