![]() Montclair, New Jersey, USA
|
Passaic River Institute For Environmental Research and Education |
|
Passaic River Symposium
"Who’s Doing What?"
Hosted by
Passaic River Institute at Montclair State University
and
Office of Maritime Resources/New Jersey Department of Transportation
June 9, 2004
Montclair State University, Montclair, New Jersey
Abstracts and Presentations
(sorted by last name of primary author)
|
Baron, L. Lower
Passaic River restoration feasibility study. (abstract)
(slides)
|
|
Belton, T., NJDEP
Historical and 2004 Planned monitoring for toxics in fish to support public
health consumption advisories - Estuarine and marine waters. (abstract)
|
|
Caplow, T.,
Schlosser, P., Ho, D.T. and Santella, N., Transport dynamics in a sheltered
estuary and connecting tidal straits: SF6 tracer study in New York harbor.
(abstract)
|
|
Chaky, D.A., Bopp,
R.F. and Chillrud, S.N., 2,3,7,8-TeCDD and hexachlorobenzene as tracers of
the Western Harbor influence on sediments of New York Harbor and the Hudson
River mainstem. (abstract)
|
|
Cooper, K.R.,
Reproductive impacts of persistent organic compounds on aquatic organisms.
(abstract)
|
|
Craw, V., Passaic
Valley Sewerage Commissioners around the watershed. (abstract)
|
|
Devita,, R.,
Passaic River/Newark Bay restoration program. (abstract)
|
|
Feng, H.,
Onwueme, V., Jaslanek, W.J. and Stern, E.A., Lower Passaic River sediment
contamination study: using GIS as a visualization tool. (abstract)
|
|
Filippone, E.F.
and O’Hearn, W.P., The “Face the River, Fix the River™” campaign for the
Lower Passaic River. (abstract)
|
|
Gruber, E.,
Watershed Management Area 4 (Lower Passaic and Saddle Rivers).
(abstract)
|
|
Houston, L., Shea,
T., Henn, R., Brattain, R., Damiani, D., Perelson, A., Schneider, S., Shadel,
W. and Goff, M., The
Lower Passaic River
Ecosystem Restoration Project. (abstract)
|
|
Johnston, C.,
Restoring our sense of wonder: a community’s dream for the Passaic River. (abstract)
|
|
Kruge, M.A., A
rapid screening method for organic contaminants in Passaic River sediments.
(abstract)
(slides)
|
|
Kubiak, T. J.,
Federal Natural Resources Trustees and the Lower Passaic River Restoration
Project. (abstract)
|
|
Lerin, P.,
Bulking & tiering wetland system. (abstract)
|
|
Maher, A. and
Jafari, F., In-situ solidification of toxic sediments by cement deep soil
mixing method. (abstract)
|
|
Mankiewicz, P.S.,
Alderson, C. and Mankiewicz, J.A., Strategic approaches to the restoration
of the Passaic River Watershed: Comparing the scale of available properties
to wetland and buffer area required to reduce pollutant loads. (abstract) |
|
Mansoor, N. and
Slater, L., Integrating high-resolution geophysical technologies with a
GIS-based decision support system into evaluation and management of
wetlands. (abstract)
|
|
McReynolds, D.,
Skinner, L. and Nichols, P., Chemical contaminants in New York New Jersey
harbor biota. (abstract)
(slides)
|
|
Moese, M., Russo,
A., Frankenthaler, V., Ellis, T. and Thompson, S., Lower Passaic River
Restoration Project - Historical data review and future data needs. (abstract)
|
|
O’Connor, J.,
Joseph G. Minish Passaic River Waterfront Park and Historic Area, Newark,
NJ: Flood damage reduction.
(abstract) |
|
Palmstrom, N.,
Mitchell, D. and Hobble, C., Screening level ecological risk assessment of
contamination in wetlands considered for restoration in Hackensack
Meadowlands District. (abstract)
|
|
Pardi, R.,
Priority stream segment: Watershed Management Area #4 - Non-tidal segment of
the Passaic River from Two Bridges to Elmwood Park. (abstract)
|
|
Pecchioli, J.A.,
The NJ toxics reduction workplan for NY-NJ Harbor: Overview of the water
quality sampling program. (abstract)
|
|
Pollock, L.W.,
Environmental influences on macroinvertebrate communities of the Great Swamp
tributaries of the Upper Passaic River, 2000-2003. (abstract)
|
|
Quillinan, K.,
New Jersey Community Water Watch. (abstract)
|
|
Rosman, L., Shorr,
B., Brosnan T. and Steinbacher, J., An ecological risk assessment of DDT in
a New Jersey urban industrialized waterway. (abstract)
|
|
Russo, A.,
Educational outreach program of the Passaic Valley Sewerage Commissioners.
(abstract)
|
|
Sacco, J.,
Natural Resource Damage Assessment. |
|
Schaffer, J. and
Horne, M., Great Brook benthic community assemblages in the Great Swamp
National Wildlife Refuge.
(abstract) |
|
Stern, E., Jones,
K.W., Douglas, W.S., Feng, H., and Clesceri, N.L., Sediment decontamination
for navigational and environmental restoration In NY/NJ harbor – Case
study: Passaic River, New Jersey. (abstract)
(slides)
|
|
Willner, A.J.,
Passaic River Patrol: An opportunity for communities to restore the ecology
and economy of a great American river. (abstract)
(slides)
|
|
Wilson, T.P. and
Bonin, J.L., Summary of the contaminant assessment and reduction program for
the NJ harbor/estuary system. (abstract)
|
|
Yeh, A., Lower
Passaic River Restoration Project. (abstract)
(slides)
|
Lower Passaic River Restoration Project Alice Yeh U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 2, 290 Broadway, 19th Floor, New York, NY 10007-1866 (yeh.alice@epa.gov) The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has formed a partnership with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), New Jersey Department of Transportation (NJDOT), and New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) to remediate and restore the Lower Passaic River, which is the 17-mile tidal stretch of the river, from Dundee Dam to Newark Bay. The agencies are bringing together the authorities of the Superfund program and the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) to produce a comprehensive watershed plan to improve water quality, address contaminated sediments, and restore or create habitat along the river. The partner agencies are also working with the federal and state Trustee agencies (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration, and NJDEP) to ensure that Natural Resource Damages (NRD) are addressed in the comprehensive plan. EPA is pursuing those parties responsible for the contamination of the river to pay for EPA’s costs of performing the study. In May 2004, a group of 31 cooperating parties agreed to provide EPA with $10 million toward the Superfund portion of the study. The agreement, embodied in an Administrative Order on Consent, is undergoing a 30-day public comment period, which runs through June 18, 2004. USACE and NJDOT are sharing equally the estimated $9 million cost of the WRDA portion of the study. EPA’s Superfund program has had a long history with the study area, beginning in the early 1980s with the discovery of dioxin-contaminated soil at the Diamond Alkali manufacturing site in Newark, NJ. Clean up work was initiated, and, in 1984, EPA added the site to the National Priorities List. An interim remedy is now in place to contain the contamination on the site, including a slurry wall and flood wall around the property, a cap over the land, and pumping and treating of groundwater. Contaminants, such as metals, persistent organic chemicals, pesticides, and dioxin, were also found in the sediments of the Passaic River in front of the Diamond Alkali site. In 1994, EPA reached agreement with Occidental Chemical Corporation to study a six-mile stretch of the Passaic River. Based on extensive sampling under that study, in addition to work done in the area by a number of other agencies, EPA decided to expand the study of the Passaic River to include the entire 17-mile tidal reach from Dundee Dam to Newark Bay. At the same time, USACE and NJDOT were also considering an investigation of the Lower Passaic River under WRDA. The agencies decided to join forces to perform one comprehensive study of the river. While the Lower Passaic River Restoration
Project is intended to be an integrated effort, each partner agency brings
its own technical expertise to focus on particular parts of the study.
Following is a summary of EPA efforts, with NJDOT and USACE work summarized
in Lisa Baron’s and Tom Shea’s abstracts respectively.
The Lower Passaic River Ecosystem Restoration Project Leonard Houston, Tom Shea, Roselle Henn, Ronald Brattain, Darin Damiani Adam Perelson, Susan Schneider, William Shadel and Marty Goff USACE, New York District, Harbor Programs Branch, NY, NY 10278-0900 (thomas.shea@usace.army.mil and roselle.e.henn@usace.army.mil) The US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) has been authorized by Congress to work in partnership with the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey to develop a comprehensive plan to restore the Hudson and Raritan Estuary (HRE) ecosystem. The Lower Passaic River Ecosystem Restoration Project (LPRERP) is one of several projects initiated under this larger authority. The LPRERP is being conducted in partnership with the State of New Jersey, Department of Transportation, Office of Maritime Resources (NJDOT-OMR). The Corps and NJDOT-OMR are working in concert with the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), as the remedy for Superfund actions are developed. This presentation will provide an overview the Corps’ role in the LPRERP. The Lower Passaic River Ecosystem Restoration
Project (ERP): What the Corps is Doing
Lower Passaic River Restoration Feasibility Study Lisa Baron New Jersey Department of Transportation, Office of Maritime Resources, 1035 Parkway Avenue, E&O Building, 1st Floor, P.O. Box 837, Trenton, New Jersey 08625-0837 (lisa.baron@dot.state.nj.us) NJDOT is the local sponsor for the Lower Passaic River Restoration Feasibility Study (FS) in partnership with the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), US. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), NJ Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP), National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). NJDOT and the USACE are cost sharing $9 million, and USEPA is contributing (through Potential Responsible Parties) $10 million towards the completion of the joint FS. OMR provides support for the overall FS and conducts in-kind services to accomplish near term high priority tasks outlined in the Project Management Plan (PMP). Check out our website – www.ourpasssaic.org to review draft project documents. Environmental Resource Inventory and
Ecological Functional Analysis Dredging and Treatability Pilot This year, a Dredging Technology Review Report and Project Plans for Geophysical Survey and Sediment Coring were prepared in preparation for field efforts and the dredging NJDOT Request for Proposals. An additional work plan will be prepared for the implementation of the dredging pilot, which will include dredging specifications, water quality monitoring and requirements for the treatability study. The draft documents will soon be on our website – www.ourpassaic.org. The dredging pilot will take place within the Harrison Reach of the River. AquaSurvey, OMR, USEPA and Earth Tech recently conducted side scan sonar and bathymetric surveys within the reach to determine the best location for the one and ½ acre dredging area. Fifteen sediment cores will be collected within the selected pilot location to characterize the sediments (planned for late June). Chemical and geotechnical analyses of these cores will characterize the material to be removed for decontamination and identify concentrations in sediments that will then be exposed following dredging. Dredging activities, planned for summer of 2005, will remove approximately 5,000 cubic yards of material to be decontaminated by several technologies to produce beneficial use end products. Highly contaminated sediment will be treated by thermal destruction and sediment washing technologies to create cement, lightweight aggregate, glass and/or manufactured soil. This program is integrated and coordinated with the WRDA/OMR Decontamination Technology Program that has demonstrated these technologies in the NY/NJ region (see abstract by Eric Stern – EPA). Hydrodynamic Studies Studies will be conducted from July 04 through June 05 to describe the physical/chemical structure of the estuary, including the 3-dimensional river flow and tidal currents, the position and movement of the salt wedge and salinity/temperature stratification, the distribution and flux of suspended sediment, and rates of dispersion. Long-term moorings, shipboard surveys and a dye study will be used. The implementation of this study is being closely coordinated with activities conducted by EPA and the Malcolm Pirnie/HydroQual/Battelle team in the upper 12 miles of the river. Further details of this work are presented in the abstract by Tim Wilson of the USGS. In-Situ Stabilization Technology
Demonstration Rutgers and Raito have proposed demonstrating
this technology through solidification of approximately 500 cubic yards of
material located in the Raritan River. The study consists of
laboratory testing and full-scale field testing phases. Laboratory
testing will assess the strength of various mixtures of solidified sediment
with different percentages of Portland cement slurry. Once a formula
has been selected, Raito will implement the cement deep soil mixing in the
field. After approximately 30 days of curing time occurs, the
stabilized sediments will be excavated. This demonstration will
provide useful information to the Feasibility Study and help determine the
most appropriate remedial actions for the river. Federal Natural Resources Trustees and the Lower Passaic River Restoration Project Timothy J. Kubiak U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Pleasantville, New Jersey 08232 (tim_kubiak@fws.gov) Federal Trustees, the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, are working cooperatively with the USEPA, Army Corps of Engineers and local sponsor, the State of New Jersey Department of Transportation, Office of Maritime Resources on the Lower Passaic River Restoration Project. We also coordinate extensively on the project with the State of New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection under our CERCLA Section 107 authorities as co-Natural Resource Trustees. We are at the very beginning of the formal coordination among Natural Resource Trustee agencies to work on the Natural Resource Damage Assessment process for the Diamond Alkali Superfund Site, related study areas and releases of hazardous materials. The above-named Natural Resource Trustees signed a Memorandum of Agreement in 2003. Under the Department of the Interior Natural Resource Damage Assessment Regulations, we are working towards finalization of a Preassessment Screen, which is a formal document which evaluates whether sufficient information is available to continue with a Natural Resource Damage Assessment. Federal Trustees have also established lines
of communication with U.S. EPA, the Corps, NJOMR, and their contractors.
We are working towards sharing information in an efficient manner that
respects the myriad authorities we are tasked with implementing.
Lastly, we have begun dialogues with Potentially Responsible Parties
concerning the Natural Resource Damage Assessment process and the
possibilities for cooperative undertakings. Close coordination among
agencies responsible for remediation (U.S. EPA) and restoration under the
Water Resources Development Act (COE and NJOMR) is needed for transparency
of process and substance with Natural Resource Trustees. 2,3,7,8-TeCDD and hexachlorobenzene as tracers of the Western Harbor influence on sediments of New York Harbor and the Hudson River mainstem Damon A. Chaky (1), Richard F. Bopp (2) and Steven N. Chillrud (1) (1) Geochemistry Div., Lamont-Doherty
Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, NY 10964 (chakyd@ldeo.columbia.edu)
Simple ratios of contaminant concentrations
measured in dated sediments provide a powerful tracer of Western Harbor
(Newark Bay/Passaic/Hackensack/Arthur Kill influence on New York Harbor and
Hudson River mainstem sediments. 137Cs and 7Be-dated
sediments were collected from locations indicative of “endmember” sources of
organochlorinated contaminants to the New York/New Jersey Harbor complex.
These endmember indicators include: A core from Central Park Lake,
Manhattan, which preserves a continuous record of atmospheric deposition
spanning the last 100 years; a core from the Hudson River at Denning's Point
(milepoint 59) which contains a record of inputs from upriver sources;
7Be-dated sediments collected approximately every 2 years from the
mouth of Newtown Creek which provide an indication of discharges passing
through wastewater treatment plants; dated cores and sediments from Newark
Bay, Kill van Kull, and the Arthur Kill which provide historical records of
mainly “industrial” inputs in the Western Harbor, including 2,3,7,8-TeCDD
contamination from the 80 Lister Avenue site on the lower Passaic River.
2,3,7,8-TeCDD comprises ca. 80% of the total TeCDD in both historical and
recent deposition at sites in the Passaic River and in Newark Bay. This is
in marked contrast to the low recent and historical 2,3,7,8-TeCDD/Total
TeCDD ratios in the each of the other endmember indicators. It is suggested
that the elevated 2,3,7,8-TeCDD/Total TeCDD ratio observed in recent New
York Harbor sediments can be attributed to the influence of Western Harbor
2,3,7,8-TeCDD. Ratios in a dated core collected from the Hudson River
near Hastings suggest that the harbor is tidally well-mixed with respect to
PCDD/F to at least 26 miles upstream of the Battery. The major
loadings of hexachlorobenzene to the sediments of the Harbor appear to be
most strongly influenced by sources on the Arthur Kill, and are largely
independent of the dominant Western Harbor 2,3,7,8-TeCDD source. The
detection of HCB in Harbor sediments indicates the potential of this
compound as a tracer in this and other systems. Summary of the Contaminant Assessment and Reduction Program for the NJ Harbor/Estuary System Timothy P. Wilson and Jennifer L. Bonin US Geological Survey, 810 Bear Tavern Road, West Trenton NJ, 08628 (tpwilson@usgs.gov)
This talk describes the work conducted as part of the Contaminant Assessment and Reduction Program, managed by the NJ Department of Environmental Protection, and funded by the Port Authority of NY-NJ, and the Office of the Department of Maritime Resources, NJ Department of Transportation. One goal of this program was to characterize the concentrations of chemicals-of-concern in the tributaries and estuaries, associated with Newark and Raritan Bays, including the Passaic River. Four groups of researchers were involved in this program. The USGS-NJ was responsible for characterizing the chemistry and the loads of chemicals, sediment, and carbon entering the estuaries from the major tributaries (the Passaic, Raritan, Hackensack, Rahway, and Elizabeth Rivers). Stevens Institute of Technology (SIT) characterized the chemistry of water and suspended sediment within the tidal reach of the estuaries, within Newark and Raritan Bays, and the Arthur Kill and Kill Van Kull. The New Jersey Harbor Dischargers Group characterized the effluent from publicly owned treatment plants (POTWs) and combined sewer-stormwater outfalls in the harbors. Finally, researchers from SIT and Rutgers University Center for Marine and Oceanographic Studies characterized hydrodynamics, currents, and sediment transport within the harbors. Beginning in June 2000 and concluding in July 2003, samples of river water and suspended sediment were collected from the tributaries and the estuaries during low-flow and storm conditions. Large volume samples (>50L of water, 1-3 grams of suspended sediment) of the water and suspended sediment were collected during low-flow and storm discharge conditions. Sediment and water phases were analyzed for concentrations of 114 PCB congeners, 17 dioxin/furan congeners, 26 PAH compounds, 27 organochlorine pesticides, and the metals mercury, methyl-mercury, cadmium, and lead. Concurrent with chemical sampling were measurements of the hydrodynamics and sediment distribution in the estuaries and bays. This data is currently being reduced using graphical and statistical methods. This talk presents an overview of the work
completed in the NJTRWP, its current status, and future plans for the
program. A brief overview is also presented of work that will be
conducted in the lower 17-mile stretch of the Passaic River estuary by the
USGS-NJ and Rutgers (CMOS) Institute of Marine and Coastal Sciences.
Particular emphasis is being placed on the Harrison Reach of the Passaic
River, the site of the pilot dredge and other investigations. This work will
involve measuring hydrodynamic properties and sediment transport in the
river, and the dynamics of the salinity wedge in the estuary. This
information will aid modeling and remedial efforts, and will also help
design appropriate methods for monitoring releases from dredging activities
in the Passaic River. A Rapid Screening Method for Organic Contaminants in Passaic River Sediments Michael A. Kruge Dept. of Earth & Environmental Studies and Passaic River Institute, Montclair State University, Montclair, NJ 07043 (krugem@mail.montclair.edu)
In recent decades, the growing awareness of the seriousness of urban environmental degradation has inspired intensive efforts at pollution prevention and remediation. To better understand pollution dynamics over time in an aquatic urban setting, a program of intensive sampling and analysis leading to the creation of geographic information systems (GIS) would be desirable. However, chemical evaluation of sediments for pollution remains a costly and time-consuming procedure, particularly for organic analysis. Pyrolysis-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (Py-GC/MS) offers a practical alternative for rapid, inexpensive molecular organic analysis, simply employing milligram quantities of dry, whole sediment. (The technique is similar to that of EPA Method 8275A.) The compounds detected comprise an information-rich mixture of thermally extractable components and the products of the thermal decomposition of (bio)polymers present in the sample. These include polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), petroleum-derived hopanes, organonitrogen compounds, and methoxyphenols. The presence of (thermally-desorbed) C29 and C30 hopanes provides clear evidence for contamination by heavy petroleum fractions. n-Alkanes present are often the pyrolysis products of petroleum asphaltenes. In the case of a sediment core taken in the Passaic River at River Bank Park in Kearny, NJ, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) of two to five rings are readily detectable (Fig. 1) and the evident predominance of parent PAHs over their methylated counterparts suggests that fuel combustion products are the principal contributors. Small, cyclic organonitrogen compounds (including pyrrole, pyridine, benzonitrile and indole) commonly occur in the pyrolyzates of coastal marine, estuarine and fluvial sediments. These compounds are characteristic pyrolysis products of proteins and degraded proteinaceous matter, largely from aquatic algae and bacteria. In the Passaic River core from Kearny, the subsample at 15-18 cm sediment depth is relatively enriched in these compounds, while the subsample at 0-3 cm show a larger terrestrial plant component, represented by the methoxyphenolic pyrolysis products of lignin. Thus, in addition to indicating the type and extent of organic pollution, Py-GC/MS also provides information on sediment biogeochemistry and the environmental context. The rapidity and low cost of sediment
analysis by Py-GC/MS makes it a practical tool for the assessment of organic
pollution in urban waterways. Py-GC/MS data are amenable to
interpretation using multivariate methods and GIS, providing valuable
information for government, industry and public interest groups.
Figure 1. Composite mass chromatogram showing the distribution of parent and methylated polycyclic aromatic compounds in a sample from the Passaic River sediment core (0-3 cm sed. depth, River Bank Park, Kearny, NJ). Py-GC/MS conditions: CDS AS2500 pyrolysis autosampler coupled to a Thermo Finnigan Trace GC gas chromatograph and Polaris Q mass spectrometer. J&W DB-1MS column (60 m X 0.25 mm id X 0.25 mm film thickness). 9 mg of dried, disaggregated sediment was heated in a He carrier flow at 610 °C for 20 s. GC program: 40 °C for 5 min., then increasing at 6 °/min. to 300 °, then holding for 25 min. The MS was operated in full scan mode, scanning from 50 to 550 Da. I would like to acknowledge the collaboration
of E. Stern during sample collection. Sediment Decontamination For Navigational And Environmental Restoration In NY/NJ Harbor – Case Study: Passaic River, New Jersey E. A. Stern (1), K. W. Jones (2), W. S. Douglas (3), H. Feng (4), N.L. Clesceri (5) (1) U. S. Environmental Protection Agency,
290 Broadway, 24th Floor, New York, NY 10007 (stern.eric@epa.gov)
Sediments in the NY/NJ Harbor are widely contaminated with toxic organic and inorganic compounds. Decontamination of these sediments is one tool that can be used to cope with the problems posed by the presence of these compounds. We describe here a federal-state program that is testing different decontamination technologies in near-commercial scale projects during the 2004-2005time period. We stress that sediment decontamination technologies must be integrated into a program that includes both navigational operation and maintenance (O&M) and environmental restoration dredging in order have enough flow-through capacity for these technologies to succeed economically on a large-scale. Other programs and projects that may benefit from sediment decontamination technologies include brownfield restoration, aquatic Superfund sites, renewable confined disposal facilities (CDFs), hot spot removals, environmental sustainability in developing countries, and energy co-generation. The decontaminated sediment may be used beneficially as manufactured soil, construction-grade cement, lightweight aggregate, bricks, tiles and/or structural fill. These products and the economic benefits derived from their manufacture may in turn serve as an economic driver for the redevelopment of impacted waterways, ports and harbors, and adjacent communities. Full-scale demonstration of a thermo-chemical rotary kiln process (cement) and commercial-scale start-up of a sediment washing system (manufactured soil and bricks) will be underway this year at sites in the NY/NJ Harbor. The full-scale demonstration of manufacture of lightweight aggregate using existing rotary kilns is also in preparation. Programmatic integration of sediment decontamination demonstrations with brownfields and Superfund tasks related to highly impacted contaminated in-water sites such as the Passaic River, NJ, and the Gowanus Canal and Newtown Creek, NY is planned. Challenges to implementation such as long-term contracts, shared risk between public and private partnerships, and beneficial use testing and marketability will also be addressed. Research supported in part by the US Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02-98CH10886 and through Interagency Agreement DW89941761-01 between the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Department of Energy. Relevant Publications/Abstracts: Feng, H., Onwueme, V., Jaslanek, W. J., Stern, E. A., Chopping, M., and Jones, K. W. (2004). Using GIS to study pollutant source function in Passaic River System, New Jersey (abstract). Presented at The Association of American Geographers 100th Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, March 14-19, 2004. Stern, E. A., Lodge, J., Jones, K. W., Clesceri, N. L., Feng, H., and Douglas, W. S. (2003). Decontamination and beneficial use of dredged materials. In: Dredged Material Management: Options and Environmental Considerations, J. Pederson and E. E Adams, Editors, pp. 112-116, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Wenning, Richard J.; Stern, Eric A.; Jones, Keith W.; and Douglas, W. Scott. (2001). The WRDA Program and emerging decontamination technologies for contaminated sediments. Contaminated Soil Sediment and Water, December 2001, pp. 38-41. Jones. K.W., Feng, H., Stern, E.A., Lodge, J.L., and N.L. Clesceri. 2001. Dredged Material Decontamination Demonstration for the Port of New York/New Jersey. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 85 (2001) 127-143. Lebo, J.A., Huckins, J.N., Petty, J.D., Ho, K.T., and E.A. Stern. 2000. Selective Removal of Organic Contaminants from Sediments: A Methodology for Toxicity Identifications Evaluations (TIEs). Chemosphere. 40: 811-819. Thursby, G.B., Stern, E.A., Scott, K.J., and J. Heltshe. 2000. Survey of Toxicity in Ambient Waters of the Hudson/Raritan Estuary: Importance of Small-scale Variations. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 19:2678-2682. Stern, E.A., Donato, K., Jones, K.W, and N.L. Clesceri. 1998. Processing Contaminated Dredged Material from the Port of New York/New Jersey. Estuaries. Vol.21, No. 4A. Jones, K.W., Guadagni, A.J., Stern, E.A., Donato, K.R., and N.L. Clesceri. 1998. Commercialization of Dredged Material Decontamination Technologies. Remediation, Special Issue: Innovative Remediation Technology 8:43-54. Ma, H., Jones, K.W., and E.A. Stern. 1998. Scientific Visualization and Data Modeling of Scattered Sediment Contaminant Data in New York/New Jersey Estuary. In: D. Ebert, Hagen, and H. Rushmeier (eds.). Proceedings of Vis98 (IEEE Visualization 1998). Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, October 18-23, 1998, IEEE Computer Society. The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. ACM Press, New York, New York. pp. 467-470. Long, E.R, Wolfe, D.A., Scott, J.K., Thursby.
G.B., Stern, E.A., Peven, C. and T. Schwartz. 1995. Magnitude
and Extent of Sediment Toxicity in the Hudson-Raritan Estuary. NOAA
Technical Memorandum NOS ORCA 88. National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, Silver Spring, MD. p. 230 Lower Passaic River Restoration Project - Historical Data Review and Future Data Needs Mark Moese (1), Anthony Russo (2), Victor Frankenthaler (3), Timothy Ellis (2), Scott Thompson (2) (1) Earth Tech, Inc. 300 Broadacres Drive,
Bloomfield, NJ 07003 (mark.moese@earthtech.com)
The Lower Passaic River has been identified by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) in their reconnaissance study of the Hudson-Raritan Estuary as a priority restoration area. This area includes the tidal portion of the Lower Passaic River Basin, which extends from Newark Bay 17 miles up to the Dundee Dam, and its tributaries. The preliminary assessment of water resource problems and needs in the Lower Passaic River Basin identified extensive habitat loss and degradation that has greatly reduced the structural and functional integrity of ecosystems within the study area. In order to design a successful restoration plan for the River, a data set must be created that identifies and measures appropriate parameters so that restoration areas may be selected, created and monitored. The purpose of the historical data review was to assess the existing and available biological data for the Lower Passaic River, determine gaps in information regarding biological communities of the Lower Passaic, and assess the need for additional information to evaluate these communities. At a further point in the restoration planning process for the Lower Passaic River, these biological communities will be reviewed in the context of other structural and functional aspects of the system in order to create an integrated database and plan for the River. Historical data collection efforts in the Lower Passaic River have sampled and or surveyed the benthic community, fisheries resources, avian and mammal communities, wetland habitats, and phytoplankton and zooplankton populations. Our analysis has revealed that there is insufficient data available to characterize most of the biological communities for the Lower Passaic River. For River Miles 1-7, there are data for most of the habitat types; however, some biological component data are limited. There is little to no data currently available for the Upstream (River Miles 8-17) and Lower Reaches (River Mile 0-1) of the Lower Passaic River, the Second River corridor, or the Oak Island Yards wetland area. In order to develop a restoration program for
the Lower Passaic River, additional biological data will need to be
collected, depending on habitat type and section of the River to undergo
restoration activities. The end uses of these data will include: the
establishment of existing ecological conditions in the project area,
assisting in the formulation of habitat restoration alternatives,
determining the success criteria following implementation of preferred
alternatives, and quantifying the increases in ecological outputs associated
with plans and plan scales. NJDEP Historical and 2004 Planned Monitoring for Toxics in Fish to Support Public Health Consumption Advisories - Estuarine and Marine Waters Thomas Belton New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Science Research and Technology, 401 East State Street, Trenton, New Jersey 09625 (thomas.belton@dep.state.nj.us)
Historical Monitoring Proposed 2004 Monitoring Task I. Coastwide Routine Monitoring:
Estuarine & Marine Species (2004) Task II. Tidal Passaic River and Downstream
Receiving Waters (2004) Schedule and Outputs Reproductive Impacts of Persistent Organic Compounds on Aquatic Organisms Keith R. Cooper Rutgers University, Cook College, N.J. Agricultural Experiment Station, 104 Martin Hall, 88 Lipman Drive, New Brunswick, NJ 08901
Studies have been carried out since the late 1980’s on impacts of persistent organic pollutants in the Newark Raritan Bay complex. These studies have concentrated on the impact of these compounds on adult, juvenile and developing embryos collected from these systems. It is apparent from the early studies that the most sensitive life stage is the developing embryo. This is critical for explaining the potential impacts of these compounds on aquatic organisms at the population level. The earliest studies carried out demonstrated that exposure to sediments collected from the Passaic River and Newark Bay resulted in abnormal development in fish embryos. These results were consistent with studies reported from the Great Lakes. Levels of dioxins which were present within the sediments resulted in severe abnormalities. Studies conducted on the suspended solids collected within the upper estuaries resulted in similar lesions as laboratory-controlled studies. Studies examining shellfish from these areas had indicated thinning of the shell and other pathological lesions that were not present in the reference site organisms. The most recent studies conducted using the American oysters have shown the transplantation even today results in poor growth and similar effects on the developing gonads and egg viability as produced with 2,3,7,8-TCDD. Comparison between laboratory and field studies demonstrate that 2,3,7,8-TCDD at levels that are found in the field can result in dramatic effects on reproduction in bivalve mollusks. In conclusion, it is apparent that aquatic
organisms, both finfish and bivalve invertebrates, are impacted through
their reproductive systems. These impacts result in a dramatic
decrease in reproductive viability resulting in decreased populations
inhabiting these particular areas. Further studies need to concentrate
on the impact of low dose chronic exposure of aquatic organisms to
persistent organic compounds such as dioxins and PCB’s. Chemical Contaminants in New York New Jersey Harbor Biota Dawn McReynolds, Lawrence Skinner and Phyllis Nichols New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Division of Fish Wildlife and Marine Resources, Albany, NY (dxmcreyn@gw.dec.state.ny.us)
In order to try and resolve the myriad of dredge management issues facing the harbor estuary, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation along with numerous agencies interested in the fate of the harbor, undertook a comprehensive monitoring effort for chemical contaminants in the water column, sediment and biota. The biological survey, specifically, was designed to: assess chemical contaminant levels in fish, bivalves, crustaceans, invertebrates and zooplankton taken from the New York New Jersey Harbor Estuary and relate them to human health and wildlife effects levels; provide a baseline database for chemical contaminants useful for predicting chemical changes in aquatic biota as a consequence of dredging and other remedial activities; and provide limited information on potential sources of contaminants. Collections consisted of: mummichogs (Fundulus heteroclitus), white perch (Morone americana), American eel (Anguilla rostrata), striped bass (Morone saxatilus) and winter flounder (Pseudopleuronectes americanus), bivalves, decapods, amphipods, polychaetes, blue crabs (Callinectes sapidus) and zooplankton. Collections occurred during five seasons (spring 1999- spring 2000). Samples were collected at nine sampling locations: Poughkeepsie, Haverstraw Bay, Upper Bay, Newark Bay, Passaic River, Raritan Bay, Jamaica Bay, NY Bight and LIS Eatons Neck. Samples were analyzed for PCBs as 209 congeners, PCB Aroclors, dioxin and furan congeners, organochlorine pesticides, PAH’s and metals. This presentation focuses on polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in fish and dioxins in fish, invertebrates, blue crabs and zooplankton. Review of dioxin and furan data is ongoing at the time of this writing. Examination of the PCB concentrations in fish showed elevated levels for virtually all species at all areas. With the exception of mummichogs in Jamaica Bay, all species and area mean total PCB concentrations were greater than the NYSDEC criteria for protection of wildlife health of 110 ng/g (Newell et al., 1987). American eel and white perch generally showed mean total PCB concentrations greater than the US Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) tolerance of 2 ug/g (2000 ng/g). The highest mean concentration was from American eel in the Passaic River (4067 ng/g). Mean total PCB concentrations per area for all species show a general trend from highest to lowest of Passaic River, Poughkeepsie, Newark Bay, Haverstraw Bay, Upper Bay, Raritan Bay, NY Bight, Eatons Neck and Jamaica Bay. Mean total PCB concentrations for all areas per species show a general trend from highest to lowest of American eel, white perch, mummichog, striped bass and winter flounder. Based on the concentrations of PCBs present
in the fish sampled from this study it is evident that PCBs are still a
contaminant of concern in multiple species of fish in the New York New
Jersey Harbor and Hudson River area. Continued monitoring of white perch,
American eel and striped bass throughout the harbor area is important for
providing information necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of remedial
and regulatory efforts and to update assessments on risks to both the
environment and public health. The “Face the River, Fix the River™” Campaign for the Lower Passaic River Ella F. Filippone (1) and William P. O’Hearn (2) (1) Executive Administrator, Passaic River
Coalition
In 1980, the Passaic River Coalition and several communities along the Lower Passaic River reacted to some major discharges into the river by forming the Passaic River Restoration Project (PRRP). Beginning with Rutherford, Lyndhurst, North Arlington, and Kearny, the PRRP decided to create a recreational corridor along the eastern bank of the Passaic below the Dundee Dam, and developed a Restoration Master Plan to accomplish this goal. By 1986, nine municipalities had joined the PRRP, and expanded Restoration Master Plan became the main planning document used by the Army Corps of Engineers for all waterfront projects along this stretch of the river. Eighteen years later, the time has come to review our progress on the PRRP and to set our sights on a total makeover of the Lower Passaic. We call this campaign “Face the River, Fix the River,” because it involves more than just improving water quality and increasing access to the river. Our logo is a park bench that faces the Passaic, because Face the River means persuading restaurants, marinas, hotels, supermarkets, and other businesses that the river can become an economic driver, just as it is in San Antonio, New York, Cleveland, Savannah, and hundreds of other cities across the U.S. The PRC and its municipal partners are now embarking on a coordinated program that will result in the Passaic regaining its role as a treasured recreational, historic, and economic resource for the citizens of northeastern New Jersey. The research behind the campaign began last year, when the PRC completed a photo survey and study of the Passaic River as it flowed through Passaic County municipalities, including the cities of Passaic and Clifton below the Dundee Dam. The Coalition is now in the process of securing funding to prepare a comprehensive Master Plan for the Lower Passaic that will address the urban waterfront planning issues from a regional point of view. This comprehensive plan will build on the PRC’s experience with the Essex and Passaic County Open Space Master Plans, the Clifton Natural Resource Inventory, and 30-year relationships with Lower Passaic communities to assist Bergen, Hudson, Passaic, and Essex Counties and the local towns along the river with action plans that will bring the river and its surrounding area back to life. FACE THE RIVER Master Planning Project
Park Development and Restoration
Dredging of Polluted Sediments
Flow monitoring over Great Falls Water quality reporting, similar to Chesapeake Bay and Seattle waterfront score cards Systematic river clean ups and tree plantings with Passaic Valley Sewerage Commission Coordination with ongoing surveys of fish tissue, etc. Continued work on the sewage treatment plants and combined sewer overflows upriver Continued work on the new Stormwater Regulations, especially the Education element, to cut down on nonpoint source pollution. For more information, please visit
http://www.passaicriver.org/ Restoring Our Sense of Wonder: A Community’s Dream for the Passaic River Carol Johnston The Ironbound Community Corporation, Newark, NJ (Caroljsc@aol.com)
Sometimes dreams emerge by just wondering how to meet an important community need. The Ironbound section of Newark, densely populated with little open space and few options for recreation for its 50,000 residents, began this process ten years ago. Bringing neighborhood residents together with the staff of the Ironbound Community Corporation (ICC), the dream of a park along the river emerged – a strip of green along a swath of blue. Over the last 5 years, community residents have come together with clergy, business people and members of community groups to give shape to this dream. ICC orchestrated this process and brought professional planners to the table to begin to translate ideas into a concrete plan. Clearly, there was a need for open spaces where families and seniors can walk along the waterfront and sit and enjoy a summer’s evening. At the same time, those interested in more active outlets needed space for rollerblading and cycling as well as athletic fields for young people and adults. The plan was beginning to take shape – the need for what professionals call active and passive recreational spaces was clear. The community also wanted to celebrate the river and the rich history of the City of Newark – the third oldest City on the US. An Environmental Center was proposed that would place a major educational resource on the River and bring learners of all ages to programs that helped locate our community within the wider life communities that had populated the River. Underlying this was the hope that the River itself could be restored to its former magnificence. A Cultural Center also was part of the design – a Center that would recognize and exalt the contributions made by generations of immigrants stretching back more than 350 years. This presentation will explore the
community-building involved in the process of creating the Ironbound
Community Corporation’s Recreation and Open Space Plan and discuss the
critical alliances that may move this plan from dream to reality. Passaic River Patrol: An Opportunity for Communities to Restore the Ecology and Economy of a Great American River Andrew J. Willner NY/NJ Baykeeper, 52 W. Front Street, Keyport, NJ 07735 (andy@nynjbaykeeper.org)
The mission of the Passaic River Patrol is to protect, preserve and restore the environment of the Lower Passaic River and Newark Bay. The NY/NJ Baykeeper, Hackensack Riverkeeper and Rutgers Environmental Law Clinic, forming partnerships with local groups, are working to return these waterways to their rightful owners – the citizens and communities of the Lower Passaic River Watershed. The Passaic River Patrol is working with citizens and communities to improve environmental quality, to stop ongoing pollution, champion public access and influence land use decisions that best benefit people and watershed ecology. The Passaic River Patrol advocates for clean water, open space protection, brownfields to greenfields conversions and habitat restoration. We advocate for the resource’s biological and social importance, as well as its value as a recreational and cultural resource. The Passaic River Patrol is putting citizens,
officials, students and the media back on the river to explore its hidden
beauty, face its challenges and place the ecology and economy of the Lower
Passaic River Watershed on a fast road to recovery. Our goals are to:
For more information, please visit http://www.nynjbaykeeper.org Passaic Valley Sewerage Commissioners Around the Watershed Veronica Craw Passaic Valley Sewerage Commissioners, 600 Wilson Avenue, Newark, NJ 07105 (vcraw@pvsc.com)
The Passaic Valley Sewerage Commissioners (PVSC), keeping in step with their original mandate to alleviate pollution in the Passaic River, are working in conjunction with various federal, state, and local organizations to protect and restore our local environment. PVSC partnered with neighboring sewerage agencies in northern New Jersey to form the New Jersey Harbor Dischargers Group (NJHDG). The NJHDG consists of ten agencies, representing twelve treatment plants that discharge to the New York-New Jersey Harbor Estuary. This group was established in the early 1990’s to implement Harbor related pollution control programs in a cost effective manner. As a representative of the NJHDG, PVSC actively participates in the New York-New Jersey Harbor Estuary Program (HEP). The vision of HEP is to establish and maintain a healthy and productive Harbor/Bight ecosystem with full beneficial uses. PVSC holds a seat on the HEP Management Committee, along with representatives of EPA, NJDEP, NYSDEC, NYCDEC, NOAA, Port Authority, and the Department of the Interior. PVSC also attends regular meetings of the following HEP workgroups: Toxics, Toxics TMDL, Nutrients, Pathogens, Dredged Material Management Integration, and the Contaminant Assessment and Reduction Project. These workgroups were formed to assist the implementation of the Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan of HEP. The NJHDG, funded by the NJDEP, is conducting a toxics trackdown to evaluate loadings from publicly owned treatment works (POTW) outfalls, combined sewer overflows, and storm water overflows. The purpose of this project is to provide toxic loading data to be incorporated into the CARP model, for use in the management of dredged material. The NJHDG is also funding and performing a PCB trackdown pilot to locate unknown discharges of PCB’s to a local municipal sewer system. The group additionally funded a metals monitoring and modeling program in the harbor which resulted in the need for the development of a TMDL for nickel in the Hackensack River. The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) recently initiated a program to develop comprehensive management plans for clean and plentiful water for New Jersey’s watershed management areas. PVSC is a stakeholder in Watershed Management Areas 4, 5, and 7. A representative of PVSC holds the position of Vice-Chair on the Public Advisory Committee for WMA 4 (Passaic and Saddle Rivers) and is active in the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) and the Education and Outreach Committee (E&O) for that watershed. PVSC also participates in the New Jersey Watershed Ambassadors program. This is a community-oriented AmeriCorps program hosted by the NJDEP Division of Watershed Management. Through this program, an AmeriCorps member is placed in watershed management areas across the state, ready to serve their watershed community. After two weeks of intensive training in volunteer monitoring techniques, watershed management issues and presentation skills, AmeriCorps members are placed with a host agency in their home watershed management area. The PVSC serves as host agency for the WMA 4 Watershed Ambassador. Watershed Ambassadors monitor the rivers of New Jersey through River Assessments and Biological Assessments volunteer monitoring programs. The members also train community volunteers in these two volunteer monitoring techniques. Members are available to make presentations to community organizations and schools, which provide information about water and watershed issues in New Jersey. Joseph G. Minish
Passaic River Waterfront Park and Historic Area, Newark, NJ: John O’Connor U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New York District, 26 Federal Plaza, New York, NY 10278 (john.a.oconnor@usace.army.mil)
DESCRIPTION: The Passaic River Waterfront Park and Historic Area project is located along the west bank of the Passaic River between Bridge and Brill Streets in the City of Newark, New Jersey. This reach of the Passaic River is eroded, deteriorated and environmentally degraded due to past heavy commercial and industrial use and flooding. As documented in the Design Memorandum for the project, the project is proposed to have three phases. The first phase will provide 6,000 feet of new bulkhead, 3,200 feet of restored riverbank, and wetlands creation. The second phase adds a 9,200-foot waterfront walkway and the third phase adds park facilities, plazas, and landscaping. Links to the Arts Center, Riverbank Park, and other sites will also be provided. The project will reduce flooding and erosion and provide environmental restoration, recreation, and economic development benefits. In light of the renewal of the commercial downtown area of Newark near the Passaic River, the project area is viewed as an environmental resource to be restored. AUTHORIZATION: The project was authorized in the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1990 (Public Law 101-640) as an element of the Passaic River Flood Damage Reduction Project on November 28, 1990, modified in the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (Public Law 102-580) by extending the project area, and further modified in the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-303). STATUS: The final Design Memorandum and Environmental Assessment were completed in May 1996. Plans and specifications for the first phase have been prepared. The Project Cooperation Agreement for Phase I was executed in May 1999. A total of four construction contracts are anticipated for the Phase I Project. The first construction contract at Center Street was completed in September of 2000. A second construction contract from Center Street to Penn Station was completed in March 2003. The third construction contract from Center Street to Bridge Street is currently being redesigned to minimize handling of contaminated materials in the Passaic River. The fourth construction contract from Penn Station to Brill Street is to be advertised in the winter of 2004. Additional appropriations will be required to complete the first phase. The City of Newark will act as the non-Federal sponsor for Phases II and III as per their letter of March 7, 2000. Because of the recent progress with the Phase I, efforts to complete the Phase II/III design are underway; and conceptual plans will be completed in the fall of 2002. The objective of Phases II and III of the project is to construct an urban park and river walk that extends along the Passaic River from Bridge Street to Brill Street in Newark, New Jersey. The Phase II/III effort will focus on developing a more detailed design of the park elements outlined in our 1996 Design Report and will incorporate the standards of the Newark community along with the Cities December 1999 Passaic Riverfront Report. A Project Cooperation Agreement negotiation and design efforts are currently underway. PROJECT COST: Please visit the general information page at
http://www.nan.usace.army.mil
and the project web page at
http://www.nan.usace.army.mil/business/prjlinks/flooding/minish/index.htm
|
Passaic River Symposium Hosted by June 9, 2004 Montclair State University |
|
|
|
T. Caplow (1), P. Schlosser (2, 3), D.T. Ho (2), N. Santella (2) (1) Department of Earth and Environmental Engineering, Columbia
University, New York, New York 10027 (tc144@columbia.edu)
Presenter: Passaic River/Newark Bay Restoration Program Robert DeVita Passaic Valley Sewerage Commissioners, 600 Wilson Avenue, Newark, New Jersey 07105
Lower Passaic River Sediment Contamination Study: Huan Feng (1), Victor Onwueme (1), Walter J. Jaslanek (1), Eric A. Stern (2) (1) Passaic River Institute, Montclair State University, Montclair, NJ
07043 (fengh@mail.montclair.edu)
*Research supported in part by New Jersey Sea Grant College Program under Project No. R/D-2003-2, the US Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02-98CH10886 and through Interagency Agreement DW89941761-01 between the US Environmental Protection Agency, and Montclair State University FSIP Program.
Watershed Management Area 4 (Lower Passaic and Saddle Rivers) Ellie Gruber League of Women Voters, Ridgewood, NJ (mandegruber@hotmail.com)
Public Advisory Committee (PAC) Education and Outreach Committee (EOC) Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Open Space Committee (OSC) For general questions on the WMA 4 process please contact Pat Rector, NJDEP, at (609) 633-8173 or visit http://www.state.nj.us/dep/watershedmgt/index.html.
Bulking & Tiering Wetland System Paul Lerin Bionautics, Inc., 15 Forest Avenue, Staten Island, New York 10301 (bionautics@earthlink.net)
Product and Services – The method of installing a Bulking & Tiering Wetland System would be constructed of interlocking sheet pilings that are impervious to the harsh marine environment. These sheet pilings are specially formulated of post- industrial recycled vinyl. They are attractive in appearance, durable, and more affordable that conventional retaining walls. Unaffected by sunlight, salt water, or marine borers, this sustainable design material has been specified for its ability to contain toxins. Application – The System would be particularly appropriate for sediments that are considerably contaminated and which may be a source of contaminants to other water ways in the area. Establishing a bulkhead and capping the existing sediments would specify significant amounts of beneficial uses material to achieve the proper elevation. A layer of sand must be applied to establish a root zone where seeding takes place and any modifications for proper drainage can be adjusted. Water Quality – Throughout much of our history salt marshes have been little regarded and often destroyed. They have been filled in as dumps and valued only when drained and developed. In the last several decades, we have only begun to unde4rstand that wetlands are a fertile and precious nursery. Besides nurturing millions of species –many endangered- wetlands replenish the Earth’s water supply, blunt the ravages of nature and provide sanctuary and serenity for humans.
Strategic Approaches to the Restoration of the Passaic River
Watershed: Paul S. Mankiewicz (1), Carl Alderson (2) and Julie A. Mankiewicz (3) (1) The Gaia Institute, 440 City Island Avenue, Bronx, NY 10464. (paul.mankiewicz@gaia-inst.org)
In-situ Solidification of Toxic Sediments by Cement Deep Soil Mixing Method Ali Maher (1) and Farhad Jafari (2) (1) Director, Center for Advanced Infrastructure & Transportation (CAIT)
at Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854 (mmaher@rci.rutgers.edu) (www.cait.rutgers.edu)
The removal of toxic sediments, if not conducted properly, could disperse the highly contaminated sediments beyond their existing location and thereby impact the environment and human health. It has been demonstrated that conventional dredging and handling techniques when applied to sediments with high moisture content may introduce sediments into the open water and expose humans to contamination. One possibility for mitigating the risk of sediment dispersion during dredging and transportation would be to implement in-situ solidification prior to dredging toxic sediments. An added benefit would be that solidification would facilitate the transportation and disposal of the sediments in an environmentally sound manner. Solidification could be achieved by mixing the sediment in-situ with cement slurry. The sediment is mixed using mixing augurs, while cement slurry is injected into the soil matrix. This technology is often referred to as Cement Deep Soil Mixing (CDSM.) The amount of cement that would be added to the soil is generally laboratory-determined prior to field implementation. This ensures that the mixed material is not pulverized and dispersed during excavation, and it also allows excavation to be performed using conventional dredging equipment. Before being recommended for use in the Lower Passaic River, CDSM needs to be evaluated for its applicability to the excavation of contaminated sediments. Therefore, a pilot study should be conducted with the objective to evaluate the applicability of CDSM in the solidification of highly contaminated soft silt sediments under field conditions. Specifically, the pilot would provide valuable information regarding the feasibility of mixing and solidifying highly organic soft silt sediments with Portland cement slurry. Additionally, the study would provide the basis for developing practical specifications that could be used in the implementation of future large-scale field operations.
Integrating High-Resolution Geophysical Technologies with a GIS-Based Decision Support System into Evaluation and Management of Wetlands Nasser Mansoor and Lee Slater Dept. of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Rutgers University, 195 University Ave., Newark, NJ 07102 (nmansoor@pegasus.rutgers.edu & lslater@andromeda.rutgers.edu)
A GIS framework is used as a database for visualization. The system manages raster images, land use zonation, topography and spatial data. We have initiated wetland geophysical studies in the Hackensack Meadowlands of northern New Jersey. Our study focused on Kearny Marsh, a unique freshwater wetland ecosystem situated within a highly industrialized part of the Hackensack Meadowlands. Surface water quality and ecosystem health are threatened by runoff from landfills, industrial facilities and major highways. Extensive geophysical surveys show that (1) the tidal connection to brackish water located east of the marsh exerts little control on water quality (2) surface water quality is degraded west of the marsh from the Keegan landfill and (3) leachate from 1D landfill and illegal dumping exert significant control on the water quality adjacent to the Passaic River.
Screening Level Ecological Risk Assessment of Contamination in Wetlands Considered for Restoration in Hackensack Meadowlands District Nancy Palmstrom (1), David Mitchell (1), Christine Hobble (2) (1) ENSR international, 20 New England Avenue, Piscataway, NJ 08854
Priority Stream Segment: Watershed Management Area #4 - Non-tidal segment of the Passaic River from Two Bridges to Elmwood Park Richard Pardi Environmental Science, William Paterson University, Wayne, NJ 07470 (pardir@wpunj.edu)
This project will be conducted over a one-year period. The study will focus primarily on the impacts made to the defined segment by the several tributaries that enter the Passaic between Two Bridges and the Dundee Dam; namely, Deepavaal, Preakness, Molly Ann, Goffle and Diamond Brooks along with the Peckman River and runoff from non-channel watershed segments adjacent to the Passaic itself. The study will have four components:
The NJ Toxics Reduction Workplan for NY-NJ Harbor: Joel A. Pecchioli Division of Science, Research, and Technology, NJ Department of Environmental Protection, Trenton, NJ (joel.pecchioli@dep.state.nj.us)
Environmental Influences on Macroinvertebrate Communities of the Great Swamp Tributaries of the Upper Passaic River, 2000-2003 L. W. Pollock Dept. of Biology, Drew University, Madison, NJ 07940
Great Swamp streams follow an east-west gradient of increasing quality in MIV and conditions. Easternmost Black Brook sites reflect low water flow, higher temperatures, and proximity to the Chatham Township Sewage Treatment Plant. Loantaka Brook also includes a sewage treatment plant, a strongly eutrophic pond, and an unidentified headwater source of very high TDS. Great Brook communities have somewhat higher quality, but sluggish flow and sedimentation are limiting. The westernmost streams, Primrose Brook, the upper Passaic River, and our "reference", Indian Grave Brook, host much improved B-IBI scores. The latter streams pass through minimally developed landscape. Community quality (B-IBI scores) at more stressed sites (Black, Loantaka,
and Great Brooks) correlate significantly and positively with habitat values
and with dissolved oxygen levels less than 11 mg/L. The same sites
negatively correlate with
New Jersey Community Water Watch Kathy Quillinan NJ Community Water Watch, 119 Somerset Street, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901 (Kathy@waterwatchonline.org)
Through community waterway cleanups, we work to remove trash and debris from riverbanks while raising community awareness of local water quality issues. Cleanups not only deliver immediate results to the waterway, but also provide a hands-on opportunity to engage volunteers in making a difference in their own community. This year, three Water Watch AmeriCorps members have recruited hundreds of community volunteers and college students to help organize and attend cleanups along the Passaic River. NJ Community Water Watch also works with volunteers, community organizations, and local and state governments to provide much-needed research about the health of our area's waterways, particularly focusing on the tributaries to the Passaic. Under our stream monitoring program, we analyze and report the contents of local water bodies, and work to map local waterways and identify sources of pollution. Finally, Water Watch educates and trains college students, children, and community members about their local water quality and the steps that people can take to make an impact in their community. Water Watch AmeriCorps members and volunteers organize campus and community-wide educational forums and conduct hands-on educational programs for K-12 students
An Ecological Risk Assessment of DDT in a New Jersey Urban Industrialized Waterway Lisa Rosman (1), Benjamin Shorr (2), Thomas Brosnan (3) and Joseph Steinbacher (3) (1) National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), New York
City, NY
DDT, DDD and DDE data from NOAA’s Newark Bay database and mapping project are analyzed for the NY/NJ Harbor area including the Newark Bay Complex and compared to sediment guidelines. Surface sediment concentrations vary throughout the estuary depending on source conditions and tides with the highest concentrations and greatest exceedances of sediment guidelines in the Passaic River and Arthur Kill. The spatial coverage for subsurface concentrations is more limited in scale. The relative contribution of DDD, DDE and DDT in fish is examined within the lower Passaic River relative to a reference location. These results are juxtaposed to tissue residues for the broader NY/NJ Harbor area and beyond. Likewise, the ecological risk posed by this class of compounds to fish, birds, and mammals is described. Given the tidal nature of the Passaic and the complexity of contaminant sources, future studies should be designed to expand sampling beyond the historic and present geographic boundaries and should consider the effects associated with the dominant chemical classes present in sediments and biota throughout the salinity gradients and miles of waterway.
Educational Outreach Program of the Passaic Valley Sewerage Commissioners Anthony Russo Passaic Valley Sewerage Commissioners, 600 Wilson Avenue, Newark, NJ 07105 (arusso@pvsc.com)
The 50 minute program starts with Power Point presentations of the River Restoration Department and Pollution Prevention Program. This is followed by a 12-minute DVD of "Messy Marvin", which entertains while teaching children about a "Messy" character who learns how his actions can add to the pollution of our waters. The presentation is completed by a hands-on demonstration of a model environment which shows how waterways can be polluted by everyday activities. The PVSC has been flooded by letters of thanks from students and teachers alike. If you are interested in having the Messy Marvin Crew visit your school, please contact Anthony Russo, Supervisor Pollution Prevention, at 973-817-5975. More information can be found at http://www.pvsc.com.
Great Brook Benthic Community Assemblages in the J. Schaffer (1) and M. Horne (2) (1) Ecological and Risk Sciences, Tetra Tech, FW. Inc., Morris Plains,
NJ 07950 (jschaffer@ttfwi.com)
Forty individual genera were identified during the survey. Benthic
communities were dominated by non-insect, warm water benthic
macroinvertebrates which were tolerant to the extremes in water temperature
and low dissolved oxygen. Infaunal assemblages included isopods, leeches,
amphipods, isopods, turbellarians and gastropods. Densities of up to 10,000
individuals/m2 of the isopod genus Caecidotea were observed. Chironomids
dominated by the genera Einfeldia and Chironomus were the most abundant
insect taxa identified. Pill clams (Pisidium), pea clams (Musculium), and
predaceous and parasitic leeches (Hirudinea) were also abundant. Results of
the survey illustrates the diverse communities present in the headwater
areas of the Passaic River drainage basin compared to the typical upland,
cobble dominated streams common to the Highlands Area sub-basins. |